Thursday, June 21, 2012

View point from a lawyer.


Before forming any opinion regarding the powers of the IIT council, Board, senate and other authorities, in the matter relating to the admission of the students to the IITs, the following provisions of the Institutes of Technology Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as IIT Act or Act for short, need to be gone through in their entirety.


Chapter I
PRELIMIANRY
1.-----------------------


2.-----------------------

3. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires, -
(a) "Board", in relation to any Institute, means the Board of Governors thereof;
(b) "Chairman" means the Chairman of the Board;
(c) "Corresponding Institute" means, -
(i) in relation to the society known as the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, the Indian
Institute of Technology, Bombay;
*(ia) in relation to the known society as the College of Engineering & Technology, Delhi, the
Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi.
(ii) in relation to the society known as the Indian Institute of Technology (Kanpur) Society,
the Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, and
(iii) in relation to the society known as the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, the Indian
Institute of Technology, Madras;
(d) "Council" means the Council established under sub-section (1) of section 31;
(e) "Deputy Director", in relation to any Institute means the Deputy Director thereof;
(f) "Director", in relation to any Institute means the Director thereof;
(g) "Institute" means any of the Institutions mentioned in section 2 and includes the Indian
Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, incorporated under the Indian Institute of Technology
(Kharagpur) Act, 1956;
(h) "Registrar", in relation to any Institute, means the Registrar thereof;
(i) "Senate", in relation to any Institute, means the Senate thereof;
(J)----------------------------------------
(k) "Statutes and Ordinances" in relation to any Institute, mean the Statutes and Ordinances of the Institute made under this Act.

CHAPTER II
THE INSTITUTES
4.4(I) Each of the Institutes mentioned in section 2 shall be a body corporate having perpetual
succession and a common seal and shall, by its name, sue and be sued.
*(IA) The College of Engineering and Technology, Delhi, shall on such incorporation; be called
the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi.
(2) The body corporate constituting each of the said Institute shall consist of a Chairman, a
Director and other members of the Board for the time being of the Institute.
5………………………………………..

6.(I) Subject to the provision of this Act, every Institute shall exercise the following powers and
perform the following duties, namely:--
(a)to provide for instruction and research in such branches of engineering and technology,
sciences and arts, as the Institute may think fit, and for the advancement of learning and
dissemination of knowledge in such branches;
(b) to hold examinations and grant degrees, diplomas and other academic distinctions or titles;
(c) to confer honorary degrees or other distinctions;
(d) to fix, demand and receive fees and other charges;
(e) to establish, maintain and manage halls and hostels for the residence of students;
(f) to supervise and control the residence and regulate the discipline of students of the Institute
and to make arrangements for promoting their health, general welfare and cultural and
corporate life;
(g) to provide for the maintainance of units of the National Cadet Corps for the students of the
Institute;
(h) to institute academic and other posts and to make appointments thereto (except in the case
of the Director);
(i) to frame Statutes and Ordinances and to alter, modify or rescind the same;
(j) to deal with any property belonging to or vested in the Institute in such manner as the
Institute may deem fit for advancing the objects of the Institute;
(k) to receive gifts, grants, donations or benefactions from the Governments and to receive
bequests, donations and transfers of movable or immovable properties from testators,
donors or transferors, as the case may be;
(i) to co-operate with educational or other institutions in any part of the world having objects
wholly or partly similar to those of the Institute by exchange of teachers and scholars and
generally in such manner as may be conducive to their common objects;
(m) to institute and award fellowships. scholarships, exhibitions, prizes and medals; and
(n) to do all such things as may be necessary. incidental or conducive to the attainment of all
or any of the objects of the Institute.
2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), an Institute shall not dispose of in
any manner any immovable property without the prior approval of the Visit

7…………………………….
8……………………………..

9. (1) The President of India shall be the Visitor of every Institute.
(2) The Visitor may appoint one or more persons to review the work and progress of any Institute and to hold inquiries into the affairs thereof and to report thereon in such manner as the Visitor may direct.
(3) Upon receipt of any such report, the Visitor may take such action and issue such directions as he considers necessary in respect of any of the matters dealt with in the report and the
Institute shall be bound to comply with such directions.

10.The following shall be the authorities of an Institute,
(a) a Board of Governors;
(b) a Senate; and
(c)Such other authorities as may be declared by the Statutes to be the authorities of the
Institute.

11…………………………..

12……………………………

13. (1) Subject to the provisions of this Act, the Board of any Institute shall be responsible for the general superintendence, direction and control of the affairs of the Institute and shall
exercise all the powers of the Institute not otherwise provided for by this Act, the Statutes
and the Ordinances, and shall have the power to review the acts of the Senate.
(2} Without prejudice to the provisions of sub- section (1), the Board of any Institute shall-
(a) take decisions on questions of policy relating to the administration and working of the
Institute;
(b) institute courses of study at the Institute;
(c) make Statutes;
(d) institute and appoint persons to academic as well as other posts in the Institute;
(e) consider and modify or cancel Ordinances;
(f) consider and pass resolutions on the annual report, the annual accounts and the budget
estimates of the Institute for the next financial year as it thinks fit and submit them to the
Council together with a statement of its developments plans;
(g) exercise such other powers and perform such other duties as may be conferred or imposed
upon it by this Act or the Statutes.
(3) The Board shall have the power to appoint such committees as it considers necessary for
the exercise of its powers and the performance of its duties under this Act.
14…………………………..

15. Subject to the provisions of this Act, the Statutes and the Ordinances, the Senate of an Institute shall have the control and general regulation, and be responsible for the maintenance, of standards of instruction, education and examination in the Institute and shall exercise such otherpowers and perform such other duties as may be conferred or imposed upon it by the Statutes.

16………………………………

17……………………………….

18………………………………
19…………………………….
20…………………………………….
21……………………………………..
22……………………………………..
23……………………………………..
24………………………………………
25………………………………………
26. Subject to the provisions of this Act, the Statutes may provide for all or any of the following
matters, namely :-
(a) the conferment of honorary degrees;
(b) the formation of departments of teaching;
(c) the fees to be charged for courses of study in the Institute and for admission to the
Examinations of degrees and diplomas of the Institute.
(d) the institution of fellowships, scholarship, exhibitions, medals and prizes.
(e) the term of office and the method of appointment of officers of the Institute;
(f) the qualification of teachers of the Institute;
(g) the classification, the method of appointment and the determination of the terms and
conditions of service of teachers and other staff of the Institute;
(h) the constitution of pension, insurance and provident funds, for the benefit of the officers,
teachers and other staff' of the Institute;
(i) the constitution, powers and duties of authorities of Institute;
(j) the establishment and maintenance of halls and hostels;
(k) the conditions of residence of students of the Institute and the levying of fees for
residence in the halls and hostels and of other charges;
(l) the manner of filling vacancies among members of the Board;
(m) the allowances to be paid to the Chairman and members of the board;
(n) the authentication of the orders and decisions of the board;
(o) the meetings of the Board, the Senate, or any Committee, the quorum at such meetings
and the procedure to be followed in the conduct of their business;
(p) any other matter which by this Act is to be or may be prescribed by the Statutes.

27. (1) The first Statutes of each Institute shall be framed by the Council with the previous
approval of the Visitor and a copy of the same shall be laid as soon as may be before each
House of Parliament.
(2) The Board may, from time to time, make new or additional Statutes or may amend or
repeal the Statutes in the manner hereafter in this section provided.
(3) Every new Statute or addition to the Statutes or any amendment or repeal of a Statute
shall require the previous approval of the Visitor who may assent thereto or withhold
assent or remit it to the Board for consideration.
(4) A new Statute or a Statute amending or repealing an existing Statute shall have no
validity unless it has been assented to by the Visitor.

28. Subject to the provisions of this Act and the Statutes, the Ordinance, of each Institute may provide for all or any of the following matters namely :-
a) the admission of the students to the Institute;
b) the courses of study to be laid down for all degrees and diplomas of the Institute;
c)c) the conditions under which students shall be admitted to the degree or diploma courses and to the examinations of the Institute, and shall be eligible for degrees and diplomas;
d) the conditions of award of the fellowships, Scholarships, exhibitions, medals and prizes;
e) the conditions and mode of appointment and duties of examining bodies, examiners and
moderators;
f) the conduct of examinations;
g) the maintenance of discipline among the students of the Institute; and
h)) any other matter which by this Act or the Statutes is to be or may be provided for by the
Ordinances.

29. (1) Save as otherwise provided in this section, Ordinances shall be made by the Senate.
(2) All ordinances made by the Senate shall have effect from such date as it may direct, but
every Ordinance so made shall be submitted, as soon as may be, to the Board and shall be
considered by the Board at its next succeeding meeting.
(3) The Board shall have power by resolution to modify or cancel any such Ordinance and such Ordinance shall from the date of such resolution stand modified accordingly or cancelled, as the case may be.

30…………………………………………………….

CHAPTER III
THE COUNCIL

31. (1) With effect from such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify in this behalf, there shall be established a central body to be called the
Council.
(2) The Council shall consist of the members, namely :- ........................................


32………………………………………………..

33.33. (1) It shall be the general duty of the Council to co- ordinate the activities of all the Institutes.
(2) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub. section (1), the Council shall perform the
following functions, namely: -

a) to advise on matters relating to the duration of the courses, the degrees and other academic distinctions to be conferred by the Institutes, admission standards and other academic matters;
b)b) to lay down policy regarding cadres, methods of recruitment and conditions of service of
employees, institution of scholarships and freeships, levying of fees and other matters of
common interest;
c) to examine the development plans of each Institute and to approve such of them as are
considered necessary and also to indicate broadly the financial implications of such approved
plans;
d)d) to examine the annual budget estimates of each Institute and to recommend to the Central
Government the allocation of funds for that purpose;
e)e) to advise the Visitor, if so required, in respect of any function to be performed by him under this Act; and
f)f) to perform such other functions as are assigned to it by or under this Act.


34………………………………..
35……………………………….

CHAPTER IV
MISCELLANEOUS
……………………………
THE SCHEDULE
…………………………..


It is to be noted that the section 15 of the Act provides that subject to the provisions of the Act and Statutes, the matters relating to the admission of the students in the institute is to be provided by the Ordinance. Section 29(1) further provides that all the ordinances shall be made by the senate. The clause (2) of the said section further provides that all ordinances made by the senate shall have effect from such that date as it may direct. But every ordinance so made shall be submitted as soon as may be to the board and shall be considered by the board at its next succeeding meeting. The clause (3) of the said section further empowers the board to modify or cancel any such ordinance and such ordinance shall from the date of such resolution stand notified accordingly or cancelled, as the case may be. The co-joint reading of the said section in light of the other provisions of the Act, makes it clear that the powers to frame, modify or regulate the procedure of admission in the institute vests in the senate. The senate has the power to lay down the policy and procedure for admission in the institutes by passing appropriate ordinances. However the Board of the Institute can modify or amend any such ordinance. However it pertinent to mention herein that the Board can not directly frame the procedure of admission as it has no power to directly pass an ordinance, and statutes under the Act can not provide for the admission procedure. Every provision regarding admission has to be provided for by the Senate by passing an Ordinance first and only thereafter board can amend or modify the Ordinance.

There is also no provision under the statutes of various IITs to provide for the procedure for admission to the institutes. The entire admission process for all the IITs is governed by the ordinances made by the senates of the various institutes. Senates of all the institutes by their ordinances agreed to conduct the joint entrance examination and laid down the procedures which have been followed till date.

It is also pertinent to mention herein that there is no provision under the act which speaks about the procedure of admission except section 15 read with section 29 of the Act. However section 33 of the Act merely confers advisory function on the IIT council in regard to the matters relating to admission standards, besides other functions. The council has not been conferred with any powers to lay down the policy for admission of the students in the institutes.

However it is being argued by some persons that the advise given by the council under section 33(2)(a) is binding upon the senate, board and the institute thereby inviting interpretation of the provisions of the section 33 (2) (a) of the Act. The said argument is baseless.

The first principle of interpretation is the literal or grammatical interpretation which means that the words of an enactment are to be given their ordinary and natural meaning and if, such meaning is clear and unambiguous, the effect should be given to the provisions of a statue whatever may the consequences. The basis of the principle is that the object of all the interpretation being to know what the legislature intended , whatever ever was the intention of the legislature has been expressed by it through words which are to be interpreted according to the rules of grammar. The legislature‘s intention can be deduced only from the language through which it has expressed itself.

The word “advise” used in the section 33 (2)(a) and (e) of the IIT Act is absolutely clear and unambiguous and has to been given its ordinary meaning which means that the IIT council has been conferred only advisory function under section 33 (2) (a) and 33(2) (e) of the Act. The IIT council can only advise the institute in regard to the matter relating to admission.

The section 33 (2) of the Act provides

(1) It shall be the general duty of the Council to co- ordinate the activities of all the Institutes.
(2) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub. section (1), the Council shall perform the
following functions, namely: -
  1. to advise on matters relating to the duration of the courses, the degrees and other academic distinctions to be conferred by the Institutes, admission standards and other academic matters;
  2. to lay down policy regarding cadres, methods of recruitment and conditions of service of employees, institution of scholarships and freeships, levying of fees and other matters of common interest;
  3. to examine the development plans of each Institute and to approve such of them as are considered necessary and also to indicate broadly the financial implications of such approved plans;
  4. to examine the annual budget estimates of each Institute and to recommend to the Central Government the allocation of funds for that purpose;
  5. ) to advise the Visitor, if so required, in respect of any function to be performed by him under this Act; and
  6. to perform such other functions as are assigned to it by or under this Act.
The bare reading of the said provisions makes it clear that a proper classification of the functions of council has been made under section 33 of the act. The council has been conferred different powers and functions and various functions to be performed by them and their nature has been classified in the said section. The council is required to co-ordinate the activities of the all the institutes. The section 33 (2) (a) and (e) confers merely advisory function in the matters relating to the duration of the courses, the degrees and other academic distinctions, admission standards and other academic matters and to advise the visitor i.e. president of India in respect of any function to be performed by him under this Act. The section 33 (2) (b) on the other hand confers absolute powers on the council to lay down the policy regarding cadres, methods of recruitment and conditions of service of the employees. The section 33 (2) (C) (d) confers monitory function on the council i.e. to examine the development plan and powers to approve the same after considering the financial implications, to examine the annual budget and to recommend the central government for allocation funds for that purpose. The section 33 has conferred different functions on the council and have properly classified them. The word “advise” has been deliberately used by the legislature under section 33 (2) (a) and (b). The intention of the legislature is clear that the council can only advise the institute in the matters specified under section 33 (2) (a) and (e) and same is not binding at all. Though some are interpreting that the “advise” means “directions” and advise given by the council is binding on the institute, but if the same would have been the intention of the legislature, the word “advise” would not have been used as has been done in the under section 33 (2) (b) of the Act where under clear cut powers to lay down policies in respect of matters mentioned therein has been conferred. Had it been the intention of legislature to make the advise of the council binding on the institute in the admission matters, the same would have been placed under section 33 (2) (b) along with other matters. The co-joint reading of all the section and the classification of the functions and duties of council made in the said section, makes the intention of the legislature clear that Council can only advise in the matters relating to admission in the IIT and same is not at all binding on the institute. The council has no powers under the Act to lay down the policy of admission or to issue any direction in this regard.

One of the important general principles of interpretation is that the statue should be read as a whole while construing its provisions. A provision of a statue can not read in isolation. The section 33 (2) (b) can not be read in isolation but the entire section 33 has to be read with the entire Act to deduce the inetion of legislature and the meaning word “ advise” used in the said section. Applying this principle also, the word “advise” is merely advice and can not be equated with the word “direct”.

The object of the IIT Act is to declare certain institutions of technology to be institutions of national importance and to ensure their autonomy. The Act declares that each of the Institutes mentioned in section 2 shall be a body corporate having perpetual succession and a common seal and shall, by its name, sue and be sued. In order to ensure its proper and independent functioning, various authorities i.e. Board and senates have been created and a democratic set up has been laid down by the Act for the said authorities to exercise their powers and function. The one of the important feature of the autonomy of the institutes is the regulation of the procedure of admission to the institute without any outside or political interference. The word “advise” has been deliberately used by the legislature under section 33 (2) (a) and (e) of the IIT Act thereby granting only advisory function on the IIT council which is actually not the authority of the institute and is an outside agency, to ensure autonomy of the institutions. Replacing the words “advise” with “direct” would amount to frustrating the purpose of the Act. A provision of Act can not be given an interpretation which would frustrate the purpose of the Act.

The word “ advise” can not be equated with the word “direct” as it would amount to amending the provisions of the Act which the executive can not legally do. The amendment to the provisions of Act lies only in the realm of the Parliament.

It is further pertinent to mention herein that the admission to the IITs can not be equated with admission procedure of the other institutes which are not covered by the provisions of the IIT Act.

In view of the aforesaid discussion it is opined that the entire powers in regard to the admission matters vest in the senate which it provide by passing appropriate ordinance. However the Ordinance can be modified by the Board. The IIT council can only advise in the matters of the admission standards which advise would not be binding on the Institute.



(Manvendra Nath Singh)
Advocate,
Delhi High Court, Ch. NO. 483, Block-II, Lawyers Chamber,
Delhi High Court, New Delhi-110002
 Email: mnsingh1975 [AT] yahoo.co.in

Saturday, June 16, 2012

Problem in adding %tile board and JEE main marks

Another observation on adding %tile marks in boards and marks of JEE main.

Since, the ranks in boards form the basis of %tile marks for boards, it will be in range of 0-100. In case JEE mains marks are distributed in smaller range (20 marks) which can happen if the test is not properly designed, the contribution of JEE main will be very small. This implies that board percentile marks will be a major deciding factor for selecting the students whose JEE advance marks will be used for making rank for IIT admissions. For other CFTIs, smaller range of marks in JEE mains and advances means that admission to specific branch will be primarily decided by board percentile score. This means normalization of JEE mains and advance marks is desirable. In order to keep the resolution high, the total marks should be as large as needed to have the earned score range almost same as %tile range i.e., 100.

Saturday, June 9, 2012

Why IITs should oppose the current followed process?

One country one test - understanding the issues. 

Disclaimer: The views expressed are my own and in no way represents the view from any organization or body.
As of now there are many interlinked issues in this proposal as minuted in IIT, NIT and IIIT councils' joint meeting of 28th May 2012. We shall try to take them apart and understand them.

The main problems which has been mentioned as various platforms by HRM, IIT directors etc, in current education system, which are supposed to be addressed by the proposed new entrance examination system, are the following.
    1. School education is not taken seriously by students.
    2. There are multiplicity of exams. For the admissions, large amount of money, time and other resources are wasted in these exams.
    3. There is large coaching industry flourishing.
The objective was to solve all the three issues in one go. In order to solve the problem 2, the natural choice was to reduce the number of examinations which an applicant has to appear in. One extreme is having only one single examination, and the other, having too many examinations. Ideally, we should have somewhere in between number, say four or five. Further, these benchmarking examinations should never be held round the year, as this will lead to disturbance in regular school teaching activities. IIT Council has made both these mistakes in their current proposal - having one single examination, and having it twice a year.

Now, we wanted to increase the value of school education so that every student will take interest in it. So, HRM (Human Resource Minisiter) thought of including it for deciding ranks for admissions to technical institutes. As absolute marks cannot be used, use of percentile ranks was devised. The fundamental assumption behind this is that marks distributions in board are according to the ability of the students. But it can be argued (see Musings of Dheeraj Sanghi), that 90%tile in one board and 90%tile  in another board are not equal. Thus assumption cannot be assumed to correct till is verified by studying the data.

Further, most of the boards (including CBSE) do not enjoy a very high a reputation for thier integrity and honesty in conducting the examinations. It is not important that they have honesty and integrity, but how they are perceived by public. On the other hand, IITs and hence JEE enjoys a much higher level of perceptual honesty and integrity with public. One can do a sample survey and verify this. This is another reason, why inclusion of board marks is not proper. Increasing the value of board marks, also increase the chances of corruption in boards thus will be leading to more undesirable situations. How the level of honesty and integrity will be enhanced, need to be looked at. In the current scenario, this is daunting task for anyone.

The above mechanism of including board marks will also not reduce coaching. As per my point of view, coaching will exist till we have scarcity of good quality resource (IIT seats in this case). Having more and more number of good institutes within reasonable cost is the solution for this problem.

Any academician will agree, if a person gets a admission bypassing a meritorious student, he will not contribute much the academic quality of the institute. In fact, he will add to degradation. Due to reputation of CBSE in comparison to IITs, the chances of manipulation are far higher. Also, in current JEE system, all the persons involved in the examination change almost every year. Thus the persons cannot manipulate the system easily. While in the new administrative structure proposed for one country one exam, same persons will stay for years and thus will be well versed with the system. This makes the system vulnerable to manipulation, unless persons of extreme integrity are are involved. Considering the way the heads are selected for various academic bodies and how they do not dare speaking the truth in front of minister, I do not see any possibility of having such persons involved in the examination process.

Coming to process followed by the HRM while trying to implement this system. Most of the IITs have academic senate which have been given powers to decide on admission process and standards. IIT council is another body which does primarily coordination among all IITs. As per the spirit of act, statutes and ordinances, the proposal should have been sent to senates. This proposal with modificaiton should have gone back and forth between council and senates so that all IIT senates are at same ground after few iterations. Once the consensus is achieved, the senate would have modified their ordinances and new process would have gone for implementation. This is where a blunder by IIT council was made. They thought to just get feedback from senate and then decide. The decision is then thrusted on senates. Their job was coordination and not making this academic decision.

When IIT council have overstepped over the functioning of senate, it is usual for any academician to assume that if it is accepted now, it will form a precedence. Thereafter, even for other minor issues like what to teach and what not to teach, the ministry will interfere via council. Thus the micromanagement of academic will start, thereby killing the academic autonomy. In these situations, it is natural for any academician to assert the autonomy. This is exactly what was done in the senate of IIT Kanpur on 08th June 2012.

The way ahead

Ideally now the chairman, IIT council should understand this delicate balance of power and functional domains of senate and council. He should start this dialogue process so that back and forth movement of working draft of the proposal can happen. Once the convergence is achieved, the council should give the advice which can be then finally discussed by the senate and the resolution to modify the ordinances can be made, leading to implementing a better system.

The council should also choose that the examinations should be conducted by IITs only. IITs can take help of CBSE whenever it is needed. Thus the reputation of entrance examination can be retained.